ZERO_COPY_SOCKETS

[Kris Kennaway]

On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 07:37:59AM -0500, Joshua Coombs wrote:
> 
> "Igor Robul" <igorr at speechpro.com> wrote in message 
> news:20051206063134.GA57230 at sysadm.stc...
> >On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 09:20:28PM -0500, Joshua Coombs wrote:
> >>#options                ZERO_COPY_SOCKETS
> >>
> >>What's the status of this in 6.0-R and 6-stable?  The idea of 
> >>avoiding
> >>memory copies when possible seems really appealing for my 386, on
> >>which any little boost is significant. : )
> >http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.0R/relnotes-i386.html#KERNEL
> >
> >So you can't use FreeBSD-6.0 and greater on 80386 anymore.
> 
> Ok, lemmie just point out that I'm already running 6.0, just to 
> eliminate that issue.
> 
> What I'm curious about is weather or not 6.0R's zero copy sockets are 
> considered stable or not.

Yes.

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20051206/add2ab84/attachment.bin