background_fsck=no does not work?
kris at obsecurity.org
Mon Apr 25 12:23:11 PDT 2005
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 09:19:16AM -1000, Randy Bush wrote:
> >>>> not always be clean. Softupdates (hopefully) means that it will be
> >>>> consistent and recoverable, but what you're seeing here is normal and
> >>> Why "hopefully"? Aren't people convinced that it works correctly?
> >> i am convinced, but some of the hosts seem not to be :-)
> >> i see shutdowns which 0 0 0 0 and then shut, and when restarted
> >> single user and fscked manually show errors. though i think this
> >> may be in current, which is on most of my hosts.
> > Yeah, others have reported this problem on -current, but 5.x does not
> > have it.
> when will it be mfced to 5.x? :-)
As soon as the guy at the switch falls asleep :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20050425/edcaa26e/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-stable