NFS defaults for read/write blocksize....(Was: Re: 5.4/amd64
Willem Jan Withagen
wjw at withagen.nl
Sun Apr 17 14:10:11 PDT 2005
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
>>> By the way, I'm thinking that more frequently hang might related with
>>> large read/write block in mount_nfs -r/-w (I use 8192, original is
>> That's certainly possible since non-default settings don't get as much
>> testing. It would be good to get a traceback.
Sorry for the typos.
> Has it even been considered to up these values to something bigger??
even == ever
> Reason I ask, is since some discussions from a year ago tempted me to do
> some (non-scientific) NFS performance testing.
> Ever since then I'm of the opinion that sizes of read/write should be at
> least 8K, or bigger depending on the data.
> And yes, I'm aware that bonnie can hardly be considered a serious
> benchmark tool. But I would think that the results would warant at least
> this change.
> I no longer have some of the hardware, so redoing this test with
> something like 'make buildworld' is not really possible. But I'm looking
> into getting again a series of older boxes to run some more tests on.
More information about the freebsd-stable