em driver worse then fxp driver ... why?
Marc G. Fournier
scrappy at hub.org
Tue Aug 10 14:44:14 PDT 2004
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Spartak Radchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 05:37:28PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>>
>> I have 5 servers sitting on a Linksys 10/100 switch ... 4 of the 5 are
>> running fxp0 ethernet, while the 5th is running em ... and the 5th
>> performs atrociously:
>>
>> neptune# netstat -ni | head
>> Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs
>> Coll
>> em0 1500 <Link#1> 00:07:e9:05:1b:2e 36915965 10306 28888840 1
>> 10858513
>
> I have no problems with em:
>
>> netstat -ni | head
> Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll
> em0 1500 <Link#1> 00:07:e9:05:46:98 1859370761 0 1709686290 0 0
>
>> uname -rs
> FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE-p3
Against what type of switch?
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy at hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list