Mail selection options in sysinstall(8).

Chris Pressey cpressey at catseye.mine.nu
Fri Sep 19 11:12:22 PDT 2003


On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 18:53:49 +0100
Ceri Davies <setantae at submonkey.net> wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 10:51:44AM -0700, Chris Pressey wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 07:48:02 -0700
> > Michael Sierchio <kudzu at tenebras.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> > > 
> > > > As mentioned by Tom's original mail that isn't possible due to
> > > > the qmail license.  You can go bug djb about it :-) (though I
> > > > doubt it will change anything).
> > > > 
> > > > Note, the license is the reason why qmail isn't included, it's
> > > > not a crusade against qmail - I also use qmail myself some
> > > > places.
> > > 
> > > Note:  in my view the problem is that the current port maintainer
> > > has decided to produce an install that is not conformant with
> > > Dan's license granting an exception to the requirement for his
> > > approval.  It is entirely possible to make a binary package that
> > > either:  meets with his approval, or;  fulfills the requirements
> > > for the exemption.
> > 
> > I quite agree.  Quoting http://cr.yp.to/qmail/dist.html :
> > 
> > "You are permitted to distribute a precompiled var-qmail package if
> > (1) installing the package produces exactly the same /var/qmail
> > hierarchy as a user would obtain by downloading, compiling, and
> > installing qmail-1.03.tar.gz, fastforward-0.51.tar.gz, and
> > dot-forward-0.71.tar.gz;(2) the package behaves correctly, i.e., the
> > same way as normal qmail+fastforward+dot-forward installations on
> > all other systems; and(3) the package's creator warrants that he has
> > made a good-faith attempt to ensure that the package behaves
> > correctly."
> > 
> > Frankly I'd be surprised if a package built straight from the qmail
> > port didn't meet these requirements.
> 
> If I installed a package that put itself in /var simply because the
> guy who wrote it says that's where it should be (on my system!), then
> I wouldn't be best pleased.  Enough said.

But that's not an argument for denying it to other users, who quite
possibly agree that it should go into /var, or who simply don't care
overmuch where it goes.

-Chris


More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list