unionfs related patch
Marc G. Fournier
scrappy at hub.org
Tue Sep 9 19:40:14 PDT 2003
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, David Schultz wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2003, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote:
> > Hello, Alexandr Kovalenko!
> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 11:19:27AM +0300, you wrote:
> > > > David Schultz, in his spare time, has been working through some of the
> > > > issues I've been able to 'tweak' in the unionfs code ... as he is
> > > > currently working on forward-patching it to -CURRENT right now, he can't
> > > > commit the code to the -STABLE tree ... in order to allow others using
> > > > unionfs to test the patch (I've been running it a few weeks now on a very
> > > > heavily loaded system), with his permission, I've posted the patch for
> > > > download at:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.hub.org/~scrappy/unionfs
> > >
> > > Looks like it pretty stable. I'm running ~10 days with this patch - no
> > > even single panic. Thank you!
> > I was too optimistic. It panics on high loads after 3-10 days.
> > Is there any progress in work on this patch?
> The only thing I know to be wrong with the patch is that it looks
> like I forgot to MFC it. Oops. Unfortunately, there's plenty
> wrong with unionfs, even with the patch.
Huh? You MFC'd it ... -STABLE from Saturday has the memory allocation
stuff still in it:
UNION mount 29 1K 1K204800K 30 0 0 32
undcac 0 0K 1K204800K 28159584 0 0 16
unpath 6086 104K 1853K204800K 26015006 0 0 16,32,64,128
More information about the freebsd-stable