portupgrade weirdness
Kent Stewart
kstewart at owt.com
Mon Mar 31 08:42:10 PST 2003
On Monday 31 March 2003 08:32 am, Buki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am begining to think there is something wrong with portutils
> (notice the difference between pkg_version and portversion):
>
> buki at dak2060:/usr/ports#portversion -v | grep -v =
> XFree86-libraries-4.3.0 < needs updating (port has 4.3.0_1)
> cvsup-without-gui-16.1f < needs updating (port has 16.1g)
> ghostscript-gnu-7.05_3 < needs updating (port has 7.05_4)
> portupgrade-20030308_2 > succeeds port (port has 20030228)
>
> buki at dak2060:/usr/ports#pkg_version -v | grep -v =
> XFree86-libraries-4.3.0 < needs updating (port has
> 4.3.0_1) cvsup-without-gui-16.1f < needs updating (port
> has 16.1g) fontconfig-2.1_6 < needs updating
> (port has 2.1_7) ghostscript-gnu-7.05_3 < needs
> updating (port has 7.05_5) lftp-2.6.4 <
> needs updating (port has 2.6.5) mutt-devel-1.5.3 <
> needs updating (port has 1.5.4) net-snmp-5.0.6
> < needs updating (port has 5.0.8) w3m-0.4
> < needs updating (port has 0.4.1)
>
> buki at dak2060:/home/buki>uname -a
> FreeBSD dak2060.xx.xx.cz 5.0-RELEASE-p7 FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE-p7 #4:
> Mon Mar 31 10:56:15 CEST 2003
> buki at dak2060.xx.xx.cz:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DAK2060 i386
>
> ports cvsup-ed today an hour ago
>
Did you "portsdb -uU" to upgrade your INDEX files? This is the kind of
thing that a mismatched INDEX and INDEX.dv would produce.
Kent
> also, I am getting some 'Checksum mismatch' errors, namely with w3m,
> lftp.
>
> Buki
--
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA
http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list