[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

[M. Warner Losh]

In message: <20060204211357.GD7604 at ip.net.ua>
            Ruslan Ermilov <ru at FreeBSD.org> writes:
: On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 09:03:13PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
: > "M. Warner Losh" <imp at bsdimp.com> writes:
: > > Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des at des.no> writes:
: > > > As I have repeatedly pointed out in the past, -O2 catches more
: > > > bugs because it enables optimizations which require more extensive
: > > > coverage analysis.
: > > Then it should be the default, standard flag.
: > 
: > I wish.  Unfortunately, there is a very vocal minority which
: > systematically opposes this kind of change.
: > 
: What breakage do you mean if tinderboxes are run without it and
: usually compile successfully?  :-)
: 
: I mean, I don't see a reason not to remove -fno-strict-aliasing
: from the kernel builds now.  Perhaps it's still needed for some
: platforms that aren't covered by tinderbox, not sure...  Can be
: easily checked with "make universe".

There's a dozen or two files that will fail to compile -O2 w/o it
spread through the tree.

Warner