[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

[Ruslan Ermilov]

On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 09:03:13PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> "M. Warner Losh" <imp at bsdimp.com> writes:
> > Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des at des.no> writes:
> > > As I have repeatedly pointed out in the past, -O2 catches more
> > > bugs because it enables optimizations which require more extensive
> > > coverage analysis.
> > Then it should be the default, standard flag.
> 
> I wish.  Unfortunately, there is a very vocal minority which
> systematically opposes this kind of change.
> 
What breakage do you mean if tinderboxes are run without it and
usually compile successfully?  :-)

I mean, I don't see a reason not to remove -fno-strict-aliasing
from the kernel builds now.  Perhaps it's still needed for some
platforms that aren't covered by tinderbox, not sure...  Can be
easily checked with "make universe".


Cheers,
-- 
Ruslan Ermilov
ru at FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64/attachments/20060204/81981ac5/attachment.bin