panic: trap: memory address not aligned in ata_prtdev() with
Nov 18 GENERIC
Garance A Drosihn
drosih at rpi.edu
Sun Nov 30 17:52:37 PST 2003
At 8:29 PM -0500 11/30/03, Robert Watson wrote:
>This was with a November 18th GENERIC kernel on a blade100.
>dmesg also below. This appears to be highly reproduceable,
>and might be a property of the bgfsck running on the system.
>I'll try sliding forward to a more recent kernel, if I can
>keep the box up.
If you put: background_fsck="NO"
in /etc/rc.conf, does that change the panic probability?
Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad at gilead.netel.rpi.edu
Senior Systems Programmer or gad at freebsd.org
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih at rpi.edu
More information about the freebsd-sparc64