NUMA?

[Ivan Voras]

Julian Elischer wrote:

> There are other interesting effects too..
> 
> assigning network interrupts to processors that have good access to the
> hardware AND the destination if you can..

UMA also seems to be sensitive to topology. While at that, how do you
(if at all) deal with kernel memory allocations with respect to
topology? Things that have their own thread or process is easy but AFAIK
there is a lot of "thread-agnostic" code?



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 258 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-smp/attachments/20081113/edca562e/signature.pgp