ports requiring OpenSSL not honouring OpenSSL from ports

[Xin Li]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 04/28/14 11:11, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 4/28/14, 6:30 PM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
>> Leif Pedersen <bilbo at hobbiton.org> writes:
>>> I realized that we don't really need any extravagance from ld
>>> at all. Move the files for the base version of openssl to a
>>> different location, and replace them with symlinks.
>> ...and break your system.
>> 
>> OpenSSL 0.9.x and 1.0.x are *not* binary compatible.
> 
> are they somewhat "API" compatible?  can you compile most code
> against either?

Yes you can.  They are just not so guaranteed to be ABI compatible.

Cheers,
- -- 
Xin LI <delphij at delphij.net>    https://www.delphij.net/
FreeBSD - The Power to Serve!           Live free or die
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD)
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=T+vN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----