Heartbleed / r264266 / openssl version

[Xin Li]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 04/08/14 15:58, Chris Nehren wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 15:47:29 -0700, Xin Li wrote:
>> What would be the preferable way of representing the patchlevel?
>> We can do it as part of a EN batch at later time.  (Note though,
>> even without this the user or an application can still use 
>> freebsd-version(1) on FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE and up to find out
>> the patchlevel for userland).
> 
> On an updated system:
> 
> [(18:56:41) apeiron at behemoth ~] freebsd-version 10.0-STABLE 
> [(18:56:42) apeiron at behemoth ~] freebsd-version -k 10.0-STABLE 
> [(18:56:43) apeiron at behemoth ~] freebsd-version -u 10.0-STABLE 
> [(18:56:47) apeiron at behemoth ~]
> 
> I can't say this is very useful.  Is this only supposed to work for
> -RELEASE?

Only for -RELEASE (note that 10.0-STABLE will be fully updated to a
newer OpenSSL release soon so I'm not going to change anything there).

Cheers,
- -- 
Xin LI <delphij at delphij.net>    https://www.delphij.net/
FreeBSD - The Power to Serve!           Live free or die
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD)
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=D/V9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----