Recent security announcement and csup/cvsup?

[David Thiel]

On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 10:05:33AM -0500, Gary Palmer wrote:
> Can someone explain why the cvsup/csup infrastructure is considered insecure
> if the person had access to the *package* building cluster?  Is it because
> the leaked key also had access to something in the chain that goes to cvsup, 
> or is it because the project is not auditing the cvsup system and so the
> default assumption is that it cannot be trusted to not be compromised?

Regardless of the circumstances of the incident, use of cvsup/csup has 
always been horrendously dangerous. People should regard any code 
retrieved over this channel to have been potentially compromised by a 
network attacker. 

Portsnap. Srsly.

-David