[Fwd: cvs commit: ports/dns/bind9 Makefile distinfo
ports/dns/bind94 Makefile distinfo ports/dns/bind95 Makefile
distinfo]
Ian Smith
smithi at nimnet.asn.au
Sat Jul 12 05:20:55 UTC 2008
On Sat, 12 Jul 2008, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> > Is there a way to restrict the ports which BIND selects -- perhaps
> > at the expense of a small amount of entropy -- such that it doesn't
> > try to use UDP ports which are administratively blocked (e.g. ports
> > used by worms, or insecure Microsoft network utilities)? We don't
> > dare turn these port blocks off, or naive users will fall prey to
> > security holes in Microsoft products. But if BIND doesn't know to
> > work around them, lookups will occasionally (and infuriatingly!)
> > fail.
>
> % grep avoid doc/misc/options
> avoid-v4-udp-ports { <port>; ... };
> avoid-v6-udp-ports { <port>; ... };
> %
This seems to imply that you can't specify ranges of UDP ports to avoid
here. For example perhaps, the range traceroute uses ..
Doug responded with a new option for a range of ports to use, but an
intersection of ports to use and ^ports to avoid, including range(s),
would cover all the bases ..
cheers, Ian
More information about the freebsd-security
mailing list