kernel disclosures

[anon:*:anon]

OK NOW i have mthis hopefully sorted , I was using an incorrect email,
 my apolgies, these are late patches already realy, they arrived via
Secunia last night to my email ::

Patches needed for 5.2.1 now ::
VERIFY ADVISORY:
http://secunia.com/advisories/15261/
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/patches/SA-05:07/ldt5.patch
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/patches/SA-05:07/ldt5.patch.asc
VERIFY ADVISORY:
http://secunia.com/advisories/15260/
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/patches/SA-05:06/iir.patch
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/patches/SA-05:06/iir.patch.asc
VERIFY ADVISORY:
http://secunia.com/advisories/15262/
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/patches/SA-05:08/kmem5.patch
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/patches/SA-05:08/kmem5.patch.asc

I hope it can be of some help,Regards,
Drew B.

On 5/7/05, Timothy Smith <timothy at open-networks.net> wrote:
> a quick query
> http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/13527
> http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/13526
> 
> are the security focus lists inaccurate? because i don't see a patch
> listed on the website or anything sent to this list?
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-security at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
> 


-- 
------------------------------------------
Signature Here
------------------------------------------