RFC: Replacing graphics/ruby-rmagick with graphics/rubygem-rmagick

[Steve Wills]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Ryan,

On 07/30/11 22:30, Ryan Steinmetz wrote:
> All,
> 
> I am planning on removing graphics/ruby-rmagick and replacing it with
> graphics/rubygem-rmagick, pending maintainer/mentor approval.
> 
> They both install the same library (RMagick2.so), however, the rubygem
> registers with the gem framework.  Without it being registered as a gem,
> other ruby applications which depend on the gem consider it not to be
> installed and complain.
> 
> As a result, I believe that the best course of action is to update the
> dependencies in the two ports that depend on ruby-rmagick
> (graphics/rubygem-gruff and www/redmine) and remove
> graphics/ruby-rmagick, replacing it with graphics/rubygem-rmagick.
> 
> I'd welcome any thoughts/feedback you may have.
> 
> I do not have any attachments to being the MAINTAINER for
> rubygem-rmagick, so if stas@ (or anyone else) is interested in it,
> please let me know.

Sounds like a good plan to me. I think leaving the maintainer as ruby@
is fine, that way we can update it without waiting on maintainer approval.

Thanks for the work on ruby ports!

Steve
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJONWD/AAoJEPXPYrMgexuh5vYH/0i2VsMwJjvFPybCipuzHA2e
8UF3PLgZxbI7l542GKUSLineL+X0KUY0oZ0tUiycVii2gjWoJZMmOflCB3wxWq8+
72bYb+fAyeiaoe4BKNX7sbgiH1IX9QLFyMIloF0kpwboAMuK+MbKet7RWFBAuwB6
CAHurp0oBxs68msIwiG/Vdy7QaPvq07+Ju+sUwnsDRr53KSD0K5nmzG8eQZZ78Ju
PyS1YuG1kgkZd34soQEB4t+cNxRZ6c3MJS4JKfV1ifKfRpnnofoWzHWWHCyV4wMG
X+mshvoQd2iPmH0Pqb5vMToDCrqF543NHe/NTr8w1noQQNTcf9oOHP16QNTVlTU=
=0U5w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----