here we go again w/ pkg ....

[Juan Ramón Molina Menor]

> On 09/08/14 17:46, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> >/  On 08/09/2014 22:18, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
> />>/  root at kabini1  <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, /etc, 4:11:53pm] 568 %  pkg version -vIL=
> />>/  curl-7.37.1_2                      <   needs updating (index has 7.37.1_3)
> />>/  gtk2-2.24.22_3                     <   needs updating (index has 2.24.22_4)
> />>/  libyaml-0.1.6                      <   needs updating (index has 0.1.6_1)
> />>/  pango-1.34.1_6                     <   needs updating (index has 1.34.1_7)
> />>/  portmaster-3.17.6                  <   needs updating (index has 3.17.7)
> />>/  readline-6.3.6_1                   <   needs updating (index has 6.3.8)
> />>/  [root at kabini1  <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, /etc, 4:11:57pm] 569 %  pkg version -vRL=
> />>/  Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue...
> />>/  FreeBSD repository is up-to-date.
> />>/  Updating FreeBSD_new_xorg repository catalogue...
> />>/  FreeBSD_new_xorg repository is up-to-date.
> />>/  All repositories are up-to-date.
> />>/  db46-4.6.21.4                      ?   orphaned: databases/db46
> />>/  dri-9.1.7_4,2                      >   succeeds remote (remote has
> />>/  7.6.1_4,2)
> />>/  libGL-9.1.7_1                      >   succeeds remote (remote has 7.6.1_4)
> />>/  libdrm-2.4.52,1                    >   succeeds remote (remote has
> />>/  2.4.17_1,1)
> />>/  linux-f10-expat-2.0.1              ?   orphaned: textproc/linux-f10-expat
> />>/  linux-f10-fontconfig-2.6.0         ?   orphaned:
> />>/  x11-fonts/linux-f10-fontconfig
> />>/  linux-f10-xorg-libs-7.4_1          ?   orphaned: x11/linux-f10-xorg-libs
> />>/  opera-linuxplugins-12.16           ?   orphaned: www/opera-linuxplugins
> />>/  xf86-video-intel-2.21.15_3         >   succeeds remote (remote has 2.7.1_8)
> />>/  xorg-server-1.12.4_8,1             >   succeeds remote (remote has
> />>/  1.7.7_13,1)
> />/  It's the 'pkg version -vRL=' output which is pertinent when you're
> />/  trying to update using binary packages from the repository.  In this
> />/  case it is clear that you have already upgraded (by portmaster(8) or
> />/  otherwise) using a more recent ports tree -- probably not the one with
> />/  the INDEX that shows some out of date packages.  There simply aren't any
> />/  /newer/ binary packages available that what you already have installed,
> />/  so pkg(8) doesn't do anything.
> />/
> />/  	Cheers,
> />/
> />/  	Matthew
> />/
> /
>
>
> I didn't do an actual ports update, just checked, using:  portmaster -L
> |/  egrep '(ew|ort) version|total install' .... I guess that's enough to
> /mess up pkg ?

Why do you persist on the idea there is something messed up? You have a 
ports tree showing updated versions of some ports and official package 
repositories which are temporarily lagging behind, that’s all!

Hope it helps,
Juan