sh man page ....

[Warren Block]

On Sat, 11 Oct 2014, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:

> I am only whining about the 'oversight' (my word) 
> since I came in the other direction (bash 1st, under Linux, followed by sh 
> under FBSD). I am making the suggestion from a purely logistical POV, since 
> bash is pretty widespread, & people coming to FBSD from Linux may bring their 
> bash scripts & such w/ them.

This is entirely reasonable.  We have programs that accept different 
options for Linux compatibility like find(1).  I'm pretty certain that 
we have man pages that document differences between native FreeBSD 
programs and others.  The documentation is there to help the user. 
Documenting differences and incompatibilities certainly falls into 
that category, particularly for the confusion surrounding a real sh(1) 
versus bash pretending to be sh.