Reverse DNS question

[Mark Tinka]

On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 11:01:53 AM Arthur Chance 
wrote:

> Slightly changing the topic, does anyone have any idea
> how IPv6 is going to affect use of RDNS for spam
> prevention? Given that machines will often have multiple
> addresses, do we have to bolt down our MTAs to using
> specific publicly visible addresses, or is RDNS just
> going to get dropped. I don't have an IPv6 system to
> play with yet.

From a spam prevention perspective, nothing changes, 
operationally.

My expectation is that mail server operators will require 
similar checks in IPv6.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20140219/9b49f554/attachment.sig>