CLANG vs GCC tests of fortran/f2c program

[Jakub Lach]

> I am more concerned about an aspect of the language the clang tools are
> written in, namely the use of object-oriented paradigm of c++ (it is a
> phony
> paradigm, one that does not exist in nature or reality, which explains
> the failure rate of C++ OO projects historically and current usage
> decline).
> I sense that the relative slowness of generated code has to do with it.
> Perhaps
> some other attributes of that code's quality too, even if not now, then in
> the
> future.

Yes, this is one thing really puzzled me. Maybe it's related to Apple's
affinity 
to Objective-C? 

--
View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Why-Clang-tp5715861p5721495.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.