Problem with routing in VmWare VMS

[Alexandre]

On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 3:13 PM, UNIX developer @ Google.com <
developerunix at gmail.com> wrote:

> Ok, I understud!
> I remove from rc.conf this rows:
> static_routes="clnet"
> route_clnet="-net 192.168.2.0/24 192.168.1.10"
>
> new rc.conf:
> ifconfig_em0=" inet 192.168.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.0"
> ifconfig_em1=" inet 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.0"
> defaultrouter="192.168.1.1"
> gateway_enable="YES"
>
>
> now after reboot the problem still the same.
>
>  ping -S 192.168.2.1 192.168.1.1
> PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) from 192.168.2.1: 56 data bytes
> ^C
> --- 192.168.1.1 ping statistics ---
> 8 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss
>
>
> netstat -nr
> Routing tables
>
> Internet:
> Destination        Gateway            Flags    Refs      Use  Netif Expire
> default            192.168.1.1        UGS         0       38    em0
> 127.0.0.1          link#4             UH          0        0    lo0
> 192.168.1.0/24     link#1             U           0     1153    em0
> 192.168.1.10       link#1             UHS         0        6    lo0
> 192.168.2.0/24     link#2             U           0        0    em1
> 192.168.2.1        link#2             UHS         0        6    lo0
>
> Where more can be trouble?
>
>
> -------------
> Вы писали 22 июня 2012 г., 0:56:49:
>
> > On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:59:36 -0500, UNIX developer @ Google.com
> > <developerunix at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> /etc/rc.conf
> >> ifconfig_em0=" inet 192.168.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.0"
> >> ifconfig_em1=" inet 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.0"
> >> defaultrouter="192.168.1.1"
> >> gateway_enable="YES"
> >> static_routes="clnet"
> >> route_clnet="-net 192.168.2.0/24 192.168.1.10"
>
> > You simply CANNOT do this. Traffic for 192.168.2.0/24 is bound to em1
> and
> > cannot be changed. You setup a static route that basically says "to find
> > 192.168.2.0/24, don't use em1 but instead ask 192.168.1.10 how to find
> it"?
>
> > This makes no sense at all.
>
>
> --
> С уважением,
>  UNIX                          mailto:developerunix at gmail.com
>
Hi,
Your problem, as Mark told you, is that you are buildinga gateway to
connect two networks on the same subnet.

Regards,
Alexandre