Why Clang

[Peter Ulrich Kruppa]

On 20.06.2012 13:45, Jakub Lach wrote:
> Really, this format of discussion is rather exception
> than rule (from my experience).
>
> Nothing wrong with productive flaming for me,
> but it's just not typical code of conduct in FreeBSD
> mailing list at all.
Actually I can't remember any flame-war about system compilers - this is 
the first one.
But I believe it is a good proof, that clang is a serious alternative to 
gcc - else people would talk about "an interesting project" or something 
like that.

Greetings

Peter.

>
> --
> View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Why-Clang-tp5715861p5720039.html
> Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>