Why Clang
Wojciech Puchar
wojtek at wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
Wed Jun 20 04:45:24 UTC 2012
>>> but not to be turned into closed source products.
>>
>> What a lying sonofabitch. That is not called freedom. That is called
>> "forcible, viral open source". I think we can all see the difference. Open
>> your motherfucking eyes, communist goofball...
>
> Give him a break. His heart is in the right place, though his choice of
GNU licence is nothing about freedom, it just says it is freedom.
But what really is important for FreeBSD is if it can be used. IMHO
nothing from GPLv3 prevents it, and it is no licence based reasons to use
clang.
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list