mexas at bristol.ac.uk
Tue Feb 28 11:32:15 UTC 2012
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 06:25:37AM -0500, Jerry wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:03:23 +0000
> Anton Shterenlikht articulated:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 08:46:51PM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
> > > On 02/28/12 19:17, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> > > >I'm putting together a small presentation
> > > >about FreeBSD for our IT support staff.
> > > >
> > > >Is fbsd POSIX compliant? Fully? Partially?
> > > >
> > > >The info here is a bit out of date:
> > > >
> > > >http://www.freebsd.org/projects/c99/index.html
> > > Looking at the doc its not that out of date. Just check the 9.x
> > > column.
> > Oh.. I see. I only looked in the top table.
> > Still, I don't get an idea from the table of
> > how close FreeBSD is to full POSIX compliance.
> > I guess that's the aim, isn't it?
> The answer is rather simple. In your presentation you would simple
> indicate that FreeBSD is not fully compliant. You then have the option
> of making copies of all the pages referenced in the above URL and
> including them in the presentation packet you are supplying to the group
> or simply referring them to the above URL. Figuring out which is more
> impressive I'll leave up to you.
sorry to be a pain.
Are we talking 10%, 50%, 90% complete?
Does the above page include all tasks
that need to be completed? In other words,
if all tasks on the above page are ticked,
does this aumtomatically give 100% compliance,
or is it not that simple?
Room 2.6, Queen's Building
Mech Eng Dept
University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK
Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944
Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423
More information about the freebsd-questions