How can I implement true vps with FreeBSD as a host?

[Da Rock]

On 01/01/11 11:09, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Da Rock 
> <freebsd-questions at herveybayaustralia.com.au 
> <mailto:freebsd-questions at herveybayaustralia.com.au>> wrote:
>
>
>     Thats why Xen usually gets rated faster- its not actually on an OS
>     because it is one. Thats classified as a type 1. The others have
>     to go through the host OS first to get something, so it slows them
>     down just a bit, though the kernel modules help that quite a bit.
>
>
> Please quit spouting this nonsense.  He's asking for facts not 
> uninformed opinions.  In both type 1 and 2 hypervisiors the guests run 
> in a protected CPU state(s) and in that regard they are functionally 
> equivalent.  If you're actually interested in learning more, Randal L. 
> Schwartz posted a great interview with some Virtualbox devs awhile ago 
> that gave detailed technical info.
>
You're entitled to your opinion, and the OP is entitled to post without 
starting a flame.
> This is best recent benchmark I see, but it's still old.
>
> http://www.ilsistemista.net/index.php/virtualization/1-virtual-machines-performance-comparison.html
>
> IMO it's particularly unfair to Xen with such an old version.  Xen 4 
> is much better.
>
> So in regards to the OP's questions, Vbox is your only viable 
> alternative is you want to run FreeBSD as the host.
>
> HRL is supposed to be coming down the pipe, but I think we're at least 
> a year away.
>
> http://wiki.freebsd.org/Hierarchical_Resource_Limits
>
> -- 
> Adam Vande More