More On Samba And Softupdates
Tim Daneliuk
tundra at tundraware.com
Mon Nov 22 17:44:29 UTC 2010
On 11/21/2010 2:16 PM, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Tim Daneliuk <tundra at tundraware.com <mailto:tundra at tundraware.com>> wrote:
>
>
> This drive is being used as a backup drive for all the workstations on
> this particular network, and "reliable" is much more important than "
> slightly faster".
>
>
> As someone already said, SU is probably not the culprit here. I've used
> Samba + SU for a long time with no such problems although I have no
> current setups to verify.
>
> SU substantially increases disk IO, it's not 'slightly faster' it's much
> faster. The error you see is probably the result of flaky drive or
> controller as the additional IO provided by SU allows the flakiness to
> show through. Although from what you describe my choice for the drive
> would be gjournal + UFS. If you've got a lot of asynchronous IO that's a
> better solution.
>
It looks like this may have been a loose cable. After reseating the
cable and reinitializing the drive, it seems to be fine. I turned
on softupdates and all seems well ... Thanks for responding...
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tim Daneliuk
tundra at tundraware.com
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list