nVidia 64bit drivers

[Jason Garrett]

On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 16:37, Jason Garrett <kingedgar at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:44, George Liaskos <geo.liaskos at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Jason Garrett <kingedgar at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 06:39, George Liaskos <geo.liaskos at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Carmel <carmel_ny at hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> > Have the 64bit drivers from nVidia been incorporated into the FreeBSD
>> >> > ports system yet? I read awhile ago that they were being developed;
>> >> > however, I have not found them present in the ports system.
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> >
>> >> > Carmel
>> >> > carmel_ny at hotmail.com
>> >> >
>> >> > |::::=======
>> >> > |::::=======
>> >> > |===========
>> >> > |===========
>> >> > |
>> >> >
>> >> > Oregano, n.:    The ancient Italian art of pizza folding.
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
>> >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>> >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>> >> > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Yes they are, they got in to the ports tree a week or so after the
>> >> nVidia release. [x11/nvidia-driver]
>> >>
>> >> Regards.
>> >
>> > Just a FYI:
>> >
>> > ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= i386
>> >
>> > It still appears this is i386 only, NOT 64 bit.
>> >
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
>> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>> >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>> >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Please see revision 1.94
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/x11/nvidia-driver/Makefile
>>
>> .if ${DISTVERSION} == 195.22
>> MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR=     XFree86/FreeBSD-x86${ARCH_SUFX}/${DISTVERSION}
>> ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= i386 amd64
>> .else
>>
>>
> This is not in my ports tree on 8.0, why is this so if it is listed on the
> website?
>

Nevermind and sorry for the noise, I ran a portsnap fetch/update and now it
is there.. it was not after this mornings fetch/update.

>
>
>> Regards.
>>
>
>