perrin at apotheon.com
Tue Jul 27 00:24:21 UTC 2010
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 05:53:30PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On Monday, July 26, 2010 14:06:17 -0700 David Brodbeck <gull at gull.us>
> >On Mon, July 26, 2010 11:24 am, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> >>When this is the way one answers a simple question, I tend to believe
> >>there's no genuine interest in dialog.
> >Well, I hate to break it to you, but people who are trying to make a
> >religious point aren't interested in dialog, anyway. In fact, it's pretty
> >well impossible to have a dialog with them that gets anywhere. You can't
> >have a sensible debate when the other person's fallback response is always
> >"it's god's will, so it's beyond our understanding and we can't question
> >it, and you're an evil person for not agreeing with me." These people
> >have been taught from a young age that logic is evil and will lead them
> >down the road to hell, so logical arguments are lost on them.
> The assumptions and bias in that statement are so broad as to defy
There appeared to be a fair bit of assumption and bias in your response
to me, as well. Pot, kettle, et cetera.
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20100727/c9b29a23/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-questions