new jail utility is available. announcement.

krad kraduk at googlemail.com
Wed Jul 21 09:08:49 UTC 2010


On 20 July 2010 21:36, Jerry <freebsd.user at seibercom.net> wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 03:45:37 +0800
> Aiza <aiza21 at comclark.com> articulated:
>
>
> > There has been the normal pre RELEASE freeze on since xmas, that is why
> > no port activity is occurring right now.
> >
> >   http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=148777
>
> Date:   Tue, 20 Jul 2010 02:47:18 GMT
>
> It was only just submitted. I would hardly expect it to be committed
> yet.
>
> By the way, there has been a great deal of port activity since
> Christmas.
>
> --
> Jerry ✌
> FreeBSD.user at seibercom.net
>
> Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
> Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
> __________________________________________________________________
>
> For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat,
> and wrong.
>
>        H. L. Mencken
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>

Anyone tried using it yet? Not much info out there apart from the
announcments it seems. In my quick play with it this morning, it didnt seem
to be binding the ips to the jails. Not sure if you are supposed to have the
ip bound to the box before you use the jail. Would make sense if you did
have to, but it would be nice if the util added it for you or at least
prompted you if it wasnt there.


More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list