AMD Athlon64 Mainboard - NOT SPAM: please check it out :)

[Da Rock]

On 12/24/10 01:44, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 23 December 2010 13:57, Da Rock
> <freebsd-questions at herveybayaustralia.com.au>  wrote:
>    
>> On 12/23/10 23:16, Chris Rees wrote:
>>      
>>> On 23 December 2010 11:44, Da Rock
>>> <freebsd-questions at herveybayaustralia.com.au>    wrote:
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>        
>>>> Thanks, but Athlon64 is a 939. Yeah, it may not be worth salvaging, but I
>>>> thought the cost might be less... I'm more than likely wrong. Worth
>>>> putting
>>>> feelers out, though :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>          
>>> Athlon64s can be 754, 939 or AM2. Perhaps you meant *your* Athlon64 is a
>>> 939?
>>>
>>> Sorry you're not having much luck.
>>>
>>> If I knew the Aussie market I'd help you to pick something comparable,
>>> but that's better left to someone more local for you!
>>>
>>> Hope you get some results soon.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>> Well thats from memory, and it is pretty old now I agree. Might have been a
>> local thing then. As I remember it only the Athlon and then Semperon's were
>> 754. The 64's and FX's were 939. The later Athlons were AM2, but that was
>> just after I got this one, and they're the X2's I believe. But again, that
>> may have been local.
>>      
> I think you're thinking of Socket 462. This might clear it up a little:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athlon64
>
> Chris
>    
No, but you're right I'll agree. Mustn't have been available via my 
sources though- only the 32bit processors were 754 here, 64 had to be a 
939. Probably some smartarse' marketing ploy... :)