Why is sendmail is part of the system and not a package?
nomadlogic at gmail.com
Wed Oct 28 01:02:25 UTC 2009
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Lars Eighner
<luvbeastie at larseighner.com> wrote:
>> You guessed wrong.
>> We use m4, which cuts out most of the crap that you had to write into
>> sendmail.cf. You write sendmail.mc and compile it. Sendmail.mc on my
>> system is less than 50 lines long, including comments.
> That's as poorly documented and incomprehensible as .cf by hand. What is
> your interest in sendmail? Are you connected with it in someway? Surely,
> yours could not be the opinion of someone who doesn't get a piece of
> O'Reilly's royalties. It's the same old crap, give the software away, sell
> the documentation.
well shit man - Eric's actually a super nice guy and has made some
major contributions to computing so I reckon he deserves *some*
respect for the work he's done on sendmail.
and frankly I find it easier to setup a SMART_HOST in my .m4 and dist
out my resulting configs to my servers in my production clusters. I
also have the added benefit that i know sendmail is being tracked as
part of the base system so it makes it easier for me to monitor
patches w/o having to track ports.
For more complex systems (my relay for example) - sure I use postfix,
and freebsd makes this quite easy to do as well. if you don't want to
use sendmail on your machines it's easy - just don't use it.
More information about the freebsd-questions