On the need for moderated questions lists
perrin at apotheon.com
Fri May 29 17:05:47 UTC 2009
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 03:14:20PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >Not necessarily.
> >There were 'rules' in Nazi Germany too, and there usually exist at least
> >some 'rules' in oppressive regimes, but they do not necessarily, by
> >virtue of their mere existence, lead to satisfying results.
> The difference is that you have choice here, people living in Nazi Germany
> (and Poland) that times didn't.
Let's de-Godwinize this, and just use the generic "dictatorship" idea to
stand in for "Nazi Germany". In fact, let's go a step further and assume
a benign dictatorship -- even benevolent, from some perspectives -- since
I'm sure we're assuming a strictly moderated list would be intended to
help rather than merely control.
So . . . you have the same choice in a dictatorship that you have in a
benign dictatorship: leave.
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
Mediocrity corrupts. Bureaucracy corrupts absolutely.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20090529/071211c9/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-questions