The question of moving vi to /bin
perrin at apotheon.com
Wed Jun 24 16:08:18 UTC 2009
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 04:22:19PM +0200, Jonathan McKeown wrote:
> You also suggested doing away with ed and /rescue/vi altogether. You may not
> need statically-linked tools very often, but when you do need them, you
> *REALLY* need them. Don't suggest throwing them away without thinking through
> the implications.
I think the intent was to do away with /bin/ed and /rescue/vi in favor of
/bin/vi -- not to do away with /bin/ed and /rescue/vi and replace them
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
Quoth Alan Kay: "I invented the term 'Object-Oriented', and I can tell
you I did not have C++ in mind."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20090624/9e8f5e2a/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-questions