Announcing: FreeBSD Custom XFCE ISO (take II) - Openoffice
sonic2000gr at gmail.com
Wed Jun 17 07:02:51 UTC 2009
Chris Whitehouse wrote:
> I would vote for including openoffice, it takes much longer to compile
> than to download, or maybe make the package and any dependencies that
> are not already included available as a separate tarball.
I've implemented this neat idea, the tarball is here:
As a matter of fact, I noticed only the main openoffice package is
needed - every other run dependency is already present in the XFCE iso.
The few other packages in the tarball are build dependencies.
More information about the freebsd-questions