NFS- SAN - FreeBSD
gpeel at thenetnow.com
Mon Jul 20 18:52:12 UTC 2009
I am assuming by the lack of response, my question to too long winded, let
What kind of performance might I expect if I load FreeBSD 7.2 on a 24 disk,
Dell PowerVault when its only mission is to serve as a local area storage
unit (/home). Obviously, to store all users /home data. Throug an NFS
connection via fast (100m/b) ethernet. Each connecting server (6) contain
about 200 domains?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Grant Peel" <gpeel at thenetnow.com>
To: <freebsd-questions at freebsd.org>
Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2009 10:35 AM
Subject: NFS- SAN - FreeBSD
> Hi all,
> Up to this point, all of our servers are standalone, i.e. all services and
> software required are installed on each local server.
> Apache, Exim, vm-pop3d, Mysql, etc etc.
> Each local server is connected to the Inet via a VLAN (WAN), to our colo's
> Each server contains about 300 domains, each domain has its own IP.
> Each sever is also connected to a VLAN (LAN) via the same (Dell 48 Port
> managed switch).
> We have been considering consolidating all users data from each server to
> a central (local), storage unit.
> While I do have active nfs's running (for backups etc), on the LAN only, I
> have never attempted to create 1 mass storage unit.
> So I suppose the questions are:
> 1) Is there any specific hardware that anyone might reccommend? I want to
> stick with FreeBSD as the OS as I am quite comfortable admining it,
> 2) Would anyone reccomend NOT using FreeBSD? Why?
> 3) Assuming I am using FreeBSD as the storage systems OS, could NFS simply
> be used?
> 4) Considering out whole Inet traffic runs about 2 Mb/s, is there any
> reason the port to the Storage unit should be more than 100 M/b (would it
> be imparative to use 1 G/b transfer)?
> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
More information about the freebsd-questions