IPFW DUMMYNET: Several pipes after each other

[Ian Smith]

On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, KES wrote:

 > ????????????, Ian.
 > 
 > May be this will be usefull for you

Yes, but I need to read it more times :)  Nicely answers the question 
about stats per flow/queue anyway, not too hard to parse for logging.

 > #1. ping -D -S 10.10.16.16 -s 1472 -i 0.01 10.0.16.1
 > #2. ping -S 10.10.16.17 10.0.16.1

Results suggest that #1 was -S 10.10.16.19 ?  A script running the same 
number of #2 before killing #1 (or such) would make comparisons between 
different runs easier to follow maybe?

Thanks, lots of useful info; hoping to try some weighted queueing soon.

cheers, Ian