which filrs/directories must be chowned bind?

krad kraduk at googlemail.com
Sat Dec 5 22:34:49 UTC 2009


2009/12/5 Gary Kline <kline at thought.org>

> On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 10:09:24PM +0000, krad wrote:
> > 2009/12/5 Gary Kline <kline at thought.org>
> >
> > >
> > >        I've just finished getting
> > >
> > >        % nslookup 10.47.0.230
> > >
> > >        to respond, so at least my test configuration is finally right
> > >        ... or on the right track.  I am not certain that I ever had
> > >        things chowned bind:bind; even before my '07 meltdown.  Now
> > >        it's time to make certain that every file that should be owned
> > >        by bind really *is*.
> > >
> > >        Anybody?
> > >
> > >
> > Have a look at /etc/mtree/BIND.chroot.dist
> > also dont use nslookup use host or dig. NSlookup is dodgy
>
>
>         Re nslookup, it is still widely enough used that it ain't dead
>        yet.  But, yeah, I just found a tutorial-like page on dig.
>        It's helpful for a utility that isn't that friendly.
>
>        thanks for the mtree tip.
>
> --
>  Gary Kline  kline at thought.org  http://www.thought.org  Public Service
> Unix
>        http://jottings.thought.org   http://transfinite.thought.org
>    The 7.31a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php
>
>
it gives dodgy results under some conditions and is actually more clunky to
work with


More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list