anybody know about a 3.01 package *With* browser?
Manolis Kiagias
sonic2000gr at gmail.com
Mon Apr 6 13:14:18 PDT 2009
Adam Vandemore wrote:
> Gary Kline wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 12:02:07AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
>>
>>> Tim Judd writes:
>>>
>>>
>>>> I don't understand the "months/years" or "weeks/days" symptom of OOo.
>>>>
>>>> On my dual-core system at work, Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU
>>>> 6600 @
>>>> 2.40GHz
>>>>
>>>> Took about 4 hours. It only seemed to utilize only 1 CPU... my
>>>> top always said <=50% CPU usage
>>>>
>>> For comparison: on a P4/2.26ghz/2 gbyte RAM, lightly loaded
>>> with fairly fast SCSI disks, it takes 30+ hours.
>>>
>>>
>>> Robert Huff
>>>
>>
>> Sorry if this is getting old.... .
>>
>> I'm running two desktops, one 2.8GHz, this one 2.4. Both with
>> "only" 1G ram. I useemy hardware pretty intensively, not lightly
>> loaded, and building a full-blown OO takes at least three days.
>> ---This is when I've got plenty of space. With fewer than 5G
>> disk, forget it. That's why I want my next computer to be not
>> only powerful but with diskspace to burn.
>>
>>
>>
>>
> just got done compiling ooo3 devel on 1.4 gz pentium-m. I think it
> took less than a day, 512 ram, nothing else running.
>
My tinderbox machine (see ports-mgmt/tinderbox and
http://tinderbox.marcuscom.com/README.html) builds this in 8 hours
(assuming the distfiles are already available locally). It is a modest
2.5Ghz P4 with 2G RAM and plenty of disk space. I am also using ccache.
I would be glad to make these packages available somewhere (this machine
is constantly building packages anyway), but I don't have this kind of
space available anywhere. If people care enough though, I could probably
create a torrent.
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list