ubsec(4) and geli(4) Benchmarks (WAS: Re: freebsd encrypted hard
disk? (fwd))
Brian A. Seklecki
lavalamp at spiritual-machines.org
Wed Apr 1 11:07:34 PDT 2009
All:
Has anyone bench-marked the performance improvements associated with
various ubsec models in conjunction with OpenSSL cryptodev acceleration
of geli(4) in the kernel?
I have a sneaking suspicion that I'm a pilgrim on unholy land here.
I'm precluding hifn(4), padlock(4), and gblx(4), which are nice for
offsetting low power CPUs on embedded platforms, from my question, and
assuming that the only supported SSL accelerator that will actually
'compliment', as oppose to 'hinder' a multi-core Xeon system, when
offloaded, is ubsec(4)?
Thoughts?
~BAS
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:33:30 +0100 (CET)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek at wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: Roland Smith <rsmith at xs4all.nl>
Cc: RW <rwmaillists at googlemail.com>, freebsd-questions at freebsd.org
Subject: Re: freebsd encrypted hard disk?
>
> It turns out that on a multi-core machine a geli thread is started on
> each core for each disk (4 cores, two disks):
and it is actually used when many transfers are done in parallel.
my core2duo saturates (both cores 100% load) at about 100MB/s disk I/O
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list