arplookup 0.0.0.0 failed: host is not on local network

Christer Solskogen solskogen at carebears.mine.nu
Wed May 14 11:22:50 UTC 2008


Derek Ragona wrote:

> Yes aliases should have a netmask of 255.255.255.255
> 
>

Still no go.
192.168.0.255 is showing up in "arp -a" and netstat -rn. (and the 
"arplookup 0.0.0.0 failed: host is not on local network" in 
/var/log/messages)

nfe0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
         options=18b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4>
         ether 00:18:f3:29:d8:15
         inet 192.168.0.3 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255
         inet 192.168.0.4 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 192.168.0.4
         inet 192.168.0.5 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 192.168.0.5
         media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX <full-duplex,flag0,flag1>)
         status: active

Anything else that might explain this kind of behavior?

-- 
chs



More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list