RAM not recognized
Paul A. Procacci
pprocacci at datapipe.com
Tue Mar 4 10:09:35 UTC 2008
Robert Huff wrote:
> RW writes:
>> And also bear in mind that amd64 uses memory less efficiently
>> than i386
> Would you care to elaborate? (A pointer will do.)
> Robert Huff
> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
The only 'less efficient' thing 64-bit programs have, are larger
pointers as well as other potenial data items. Though I'm not sure I'd
consider this 'less efficient'.
Ok, so we have larger binaries and a bit more ram usage for the
aforementioned, but isn't that all? I'd guess to say yes, and if it is,
then that's not so bad. In fact, I don't think I'd even call is an
My 2 cents.
More information about the freebsd-questions