ARP Messages

Erik Norgaard norgaard at locolomo.org
Tue Feb 26 15:04:30 UTC 2008


Mel wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 February 2008 15:42:41 Erik Norgaard wrote:
>> Mel wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 26 February 2008 13:14:11 Mächler Philippe wrote:
>>>> %netstat -rn
>>>> Routing tables
>>>>
>>>> Internet:
>>>> Destination        Gateway            Flags    Refs      Use
>>>> Netif Expire
>>>>
>>>> 192.168.2          192.168.3.254      UGS         0     8209
>>>> bge1
>>>> 192.168.3          link#2             UC          0        0
>>>> bge1
>>> These routes look fishy. It shouldn't have a route for 192.168.2 cause
>>> it's nowhere defined, so it should go through default, not through bge1.
>>> Any chance a machine on your network has 192.168.2/24 and publishing it,
>>> where it should be 80.242 something?
>>> Try route delete 192.168.2.0 and see if it clears.
>> This part is ok if you see the schema in OPs later mail.
> 
> Really? Where do you see 192.168.TWO instead of 192.168.THREE?

OK, this is the schema OP posted in a different mail, lines wrapped 
badly, I've repaired:

  -------------                  ---------------
¦   server    ¦     switch     ¦router/firewall¦     switch
¦192.168.3.222¦---[(3.x/24)]---¦ 192.168.3.254 ¦---[(2.x/24)]
¦80.242.192.80¦bge1             ---------------
  -------------
       ¦bge0
       ¦
    [switch]----[Gateway 80.242.192.65]---[INTERNET]

As you see, the routing table is from the server, the 192.168.2/24 
network is behind the firewall. It must have a static route on bge1 with 
  gateway 192.168.3.254.

Erik





More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list