FreeBSD SAMBA file server performance - strange behaviour

Nenad Mihajlovic nenad at venturis.hu
Tue Feb 26 11:52:57 UTC 2008


I found it.

I'll try it out, and see what we get.
Interesting thing is, that i went again to verify the finds that i  
wrote in my letter, and it is not the ping itself that increases  
performance, but the fact of multiple connections - while pinging from  
console (ping -f), the behaviour stays the same, 5-13 Mb/sec varying,  
when i log in through ssh and do the ping -f , it seems to me that the  
fact of the second _active_ connection actually improves the things.

Nenad


<SNIP>
...
>> On the other hand, i experienced that when i try PING on the File
>> server's IP address from the fileserver, i get performance increase in
>> the transfer speed - the bigger the traffic i generate, the better the
>> results, which max out at 25-27 MB/sec with flood ping.
>>
>> Has anyone else experienced any similar behaviour?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Nenad
>
> Just as an FYI, you may find it better to use FreeNAS, which is based
> on FreeBSD.
>
> http://www.freenas.org/
>
>
>         -Derek
>
>
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>>
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>> believed to be clean.
>>
>>
>>
>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus   
>> signature database 2900 (20080225) __________
>>
>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.


----- End message from derek at computinginnovations.com -----




More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list