listserver problems?

[Ott Köstner]

On Thursday 18 December 2008 1:47:01 pm Michael Scheidell wrote:
> might be generic listserver issues, but I noticed that at least on 
> freebsd-jail list, it does NOT strip out dkim/domainkeys signatures.
> 
> that might not be to bad, but it does 'mung' the headers, so dkim signed 
> email passed through freebsd mailing list server comes back as a forged 
> signature.

Probably depends, how and with what software you check it. At least, SpamAssassin responds correctly to this signature:

X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Checker-URL: http://info.zzz.ee
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53])
	by zzz.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8CBEFD53A
	for <ottk at zzz.ee>; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:48:00 +0200 (EET)
Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36])
	by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF81916315A;
	Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:47:13 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions at freebsd.org)
Received: from hub.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FDEC106571F;
	Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:47:12 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions at freebsd.org)
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions at freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B19D1065679;
	Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:47:03 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from scheidell at secnap.net)
Received: from fl.us.spammertrap.net (fl.us.spammertrap.net [204.89.241.173])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 338948FC32;
	Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:47:03 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from scheidell at secnap.net)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by fl.us.spammertrap.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E43E6089;
	Thu, 18 Dec 2008 06:47:02 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=secnap.net; h=
	content-type:subject:mime-version:user-agent:from:date
	:message-id:received:received:x-virus-scanned; s=dkim; t=
	1229600821; bh=D2GNQjbJ0V6T+z6wbS0oY6z3CMZTNqKW4+nF83Mp06k=; b=Y
	tjC87NB2Vu+z8zFh6JMsKQhxhlNafGj3yyQMJW/EvfyDDQxsMWtvx/kx5gRJnHDD
	oJOt0zcSAXUTiD/EhOuRCrb3KOr1nErTcWPns31B44q/4dL7l09vnuT+VswvRZoZ
	3jZFZZGHZRr2FtOjgdDQkJKZIk0elPc2i67Bif30Hc=
X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) -
	fl.us.spammertrap.net
X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) SME-150 1.89 at fl.us.spammertrap.net
Received: from secnap3.secnap.com (secnap3.secnap.com [204.89.241.130])
	by fl.us.spammertrap.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E99E5E6088;
	Thu, 18 Dec 2008 06:47:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from 21.sub-70-222-163.myvzw.com ([10.80.0.4]) by secnap3.secnap.com
	with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); 
	Thu, 18 Dec 2008 06:47:01 -0500
Message-ID: <494A3835.30302 at secnap.net>
 
> whoever is working on the listservers can contact me for assistance on 
> it.  maybe just a postfix header IGNORE rule would strip it back out.

Talking about Mailman configuration, personally I would like if these mailinglists here had 'subject_prefix', something like
[FreeBSD-QUESTIONS:%d] 



Greetings,
O.K.



-- 
Mõõda oma inteneti kiirust / Test Your Internet speed
http://tallinn.speedtest.net/