ADSL Bandwidth Monitoring
RW
fbsd06 at mlists.homeunix.com
Sun Sep 9 14:35:27 PDT 2007
On Sat, 8 Sep 2007 23:16:35 -0700
"Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm at toybox.placo.com> wrote:
> ...
> However, the thing that most people (who don't work at telcos) do not
> understand is that the telcos found very quickly that they cannot put
> contention into an ATM network comprised of a DSL atm circuits for a
> very simple reason.
>
> ...
> SO, the cost of discarding a single 56 byte ATM cell means the ATM
> cloud will have to get another 1400 bytes of data retransmitted
> through it.
>
> It doesen't take a rocket scientist to see that introducing contention
> into an ATM circuit carrying a DSL circuit will cause a massive
> increase in traffic in the switch, and wipe out any gains from
> contention.
I don't know much about DSLAMS, but ATM switches have been able to drop
whole AAL5 frames for a long time. Do DSLAMS really not have EPD/PPD?
However the contention is done, it definitely happens in the UK.
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list