Portupgrade used to be fun!!!
rsmith at xs4all.nl
Sat Oct 27 16:49:17 PDT 2007
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 05:34:03PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > I have used (and still do) both flavors of the above and I have to tell
> > y, updating the installed apps is as easy as apt-get update ot yum
> > update/upgrade.
> . . . except when they break something. It's a lot easier to fix broken
> software on FreeBSD than with a binary packaged based Linux distribution,
> in my (recent) experience.
I rarely see port breakage. If I do it's usually a case of PEBKAC, :-)
Having said that, switching between major versions of FreeBSD can be a
hassle with ports.
> > I used to love spending my Friday nights updating my FreeBSD ports -
> > then, as you are finding out - it's just getting tedious.
> I've never found updating the software on a system "fun". That's part of
> the reason I find I prefer FreeBSD: it doesn't break shit as often, and
> thus doesn't make it even *more* un-fun.
In my experience it is much easier to keep ports updated every other
week or so than to to it after a couple of months.
Only when switching between major versions of FreeBSD it is time for
drastic measures. I usually delete and reinstall all ports after making
such a switch. It is the best way to keep the amount of old cruft on the
system to a minimum.
[plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated]
pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20071027/bc22efe1/attachment.pgp
More information about the freebsd-questions