[OT] proper editor

[Byung-Hee HWANG]

On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 08:47 +0300, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
> Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
> > Hi there, I'm beginner.
> >
> > Please recommend for proper editor so that ...
> > I want to practice *Python* under best environment ...
> >
> > vim, emacs, gedit, or notepad.exe, ... 
> >
> > If you give me good advice about that, I'll study very hard ...
> >
> > So which one is best editor? ...
> >
> >   
> There is no such thing as a "best" editor. Which one you know better NOW?
> If the goal is to study Python (assuming no previous experience), go
> along with the easiest for you. For starters, if you are using a  GUI,
> go with Python's own IDLE environment. It is not "advanced", but neither
> are you at this point. And it does have some advantages (like immediate
> execution of commands to try out things).
> Spending time learning a complex editor like vi or emacs, will certainly
> pay up in the long run though.

Nope. I don't care what it costs. I don't care even if I have to learn a
complex editor for long time ...

To tell truth, I really want to learn Python with a complex editor like
Emacs. I feel so sorry for I object to your professional opinion;; 

-- 
Byung-Hee HWANG <bh at izb.knu.ac.kr>

"Are you willing to take my advice this time?"
		-- Vito Corleone, "Chapter 1", page 37