raid or not raid

[kalin mintchev]

> On Fri, 25 May 2007 04:37:25 -0400 (EDT)
> "kalin mintchev" <kalin at el.net> wrote:
>
> replying to your email down the thread...but using this content...
>
>>  L(q)  ops/s    r/s   kBps   ms/r    w/s   kBps   ms/w   %busy Name
>>     0      6      6    627    8.5      0      0    0.0    5.0| ad4
>
> The actual disk, ad4
>
>>     0      6      6    627    8.5      0      0    0.0    5.0| ad4s1
>
> the first slice in the disk
>
>>     0      0      0      0    0.0      0      0    0.0    0.0| ad6
>>     0      0      0      0    0.0      0      0    0.0    0.0| ad4s1a
>>     0      0      0      0    0.0      0      0    0.0    0.0| ad4s1b
>>     0      0      0      0    0.0      0      0    0.0    0.0| ad4s1c
>>     0      0      0      0    0.0      0      0    0.0    0.0| ad4s1d
>>     0      0      0      0    0.0      0      0    0.0    0.0| ad4s1e
>>     0      0      0      0    0.0      0      0    0.0    0.0| ad4s1f
>>     0      6      6    627    8.5      0      0    0.0    5.0| ad4s1g
>
> the g partition in slice 1 of disk ad4.
>
> They all get used (from the GEOM POV) when , for example, userland access
> the fs located in ad4s1g .
>
> clear as mud?  ;)

that's what i meant...  well... cool..  thanks to all...
now i have to make some 'interesting' phone calls....


> _________________________
> {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
>
> Your reasoning is excellent -- it's only your basic assumptions that are
> wrong.
>
> I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when
> wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You
> have been Warned.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>