porteasy vs portupgrade
Adam J Richardson
fatman.uk at gmail.com
Thu Jul 26 03:50:34 UTC 2007
Miguel wrote:
> Hi, i used to use portupgrade as using this instructions
> http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2001/11/29/Big_Scary_Daemons.html
> for doing all the port managing, what about porteasy, it is as good as
> portupgrade?
> i think porteasy is not as popular as portupgrade.
> thanks
Hi Miguel,
I use portupgrade and portsnap, a combination which seems to work fine.
The only thing that annoys me about portupgrade is that it's written in
Ruby, and when it's time for an upgrade I always have to upgrade the
Ruby compiler as well. Upgrading Ruby just takes forever on these old
battered beige boxes.
I have similar issues with Darcs and the Glasgow Haskell Compiler. Wish
they could be ported to C++ or something. Oh well.
One bit of advice I would do well to remember is: the first thing to do
after /installing/ the ports tree is to /update/ the ports tree. I
forgot one time and had to upgrade all my apps when I'd installed them. :/
Adam J Richardson
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list